Multiculturalismo na literatura canadense - Doi: 10.5212/Uniletras.v.32i2.0006
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canada is often described as a multicultural nation. This means that Canadians do not have a single cultural background; instead Canadians are the result of racial miscegenation and cultural diversity. In other words, Canadians reflect a vast diversity of cultural heritages and ethnic groups. This multicultural diversity is the result of decades of immigration. Charles Taylor is a Canadian philosopher concerned with the politics of recognition and identity. He rises above the raging polemics that often characterize discussions of identity groups and offers a fair-minded assessment of the role they play in democracies. With the move from honor to dignity, the questions of identity and multiculturalism have become the target of political discussions, emphasizing the equality of all citizens. The aim of this paper is to discuss how Taylor’s theory has been seen as a new possibility of interpretation in Canadian literary theory and criticism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.017 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".