MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W161736330

Approaches to High Accuracy Retrieval: Phrase-Based Search Experiments in the HARD Track.

2004· article· en· W161736330 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueText REtrieval Conference · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNatural Language Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceFocus (optics)PhraseSelection (genetic algorithm)Natural language processingWord (group theory)Artificial intelligenceNoun phraseNounInformation retrievalMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our main research focus this year was on the use of phrases (or multi-word units) in query expansion. Multi-word units (MWUs) comprise a number of lexical units, such as named entities (“United Nations”), nominal compounds (“amusement park”) and phrasal verbs (‘check in’). Although MWUs can belong to different parts of speech, our focus was on nominal MWUs. We used a combined syntactico-statistical approach for selecting nominal MWUs. In the first selection pass we obtained valid noun phrases, and in the second pass we used statistical measures to select strongly bound MWUs. We have experimented with using two statistical measures of selecting MWUs from text: the C-value (Frantzi and Ananiadou 1996, Vintar 2004) and the Log-Likelihood ratio (Dunning 1993). Selected MWUs were then suggested to the user for interactive query expansion. Two main research questions were studied in these experiments:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it