MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1617693383 · doi:10.1063/1.1433166

Crystalline Si/SiO2 quantum wells

2002· article· en· W1617693383 on OpenAlexaff
Zheng‐Hong Lu, D. Grozea

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantum wellX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyAuger electron spectroscopyBand gapMaterials scienceSpectroscopyAbsorption edgePhotoemission spectroscopySiliconElectronic band structureCondensed matter physicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryOptoelectronicsPhysicsOpticsNuclear magnetic resonance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on epitaxial layer transfer silicon on insulator wafers, crystalline Si/SiO2 quantum wells have been made. The chemical composition of the quantum wells was studied by Auger electron spectroscopy depth profile. The crystalline structure of the well was confirmed by x-ray photoelectron diffraction. Band-edge shifts in the conduction-band minimum and in the valence-band maximum were measured by using synchrotron x-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy and by using laboratory x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, respectively. It is found that the energy gaps of the quantum wells increase as the Si layer is reduced to below 3 nm, as expected for well-defined quantum wells. The experimental data provide direct evidence of a quantum-confined band-gap increase, which has been theoretically predicted for the crystalline Si/SiO2 quantum-well system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations70
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicSilicon Nanostructures and PhotoluminescenceFrench-language works237,207