MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1618185498 · doi:10.14740/jmc.v6i6.811

A Case of Severe Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis in an Immunocompromised Pregnant Patient

2015· article· en· W1618185498 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marijo Aguilera, Anne Marie Furuseth, Lauren Giacobbe, Katherine Jacobs, Kirk D. Ramin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicVector-borne infectious diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMalaiseDiseaseAzathioprinePregnancyIncidence (geometry)PediatricsChillsEhrlichiosisDermatologySurgeryTickInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA) is a tick-borne disease that can often result in persistent fevers and other non-specific symptoms including myalgias, headache, and malaise. The incidence among endemic areas has been increasing, and clinician recognition of disease symptoms has aided in the correct diagnosis and treatment of patients who have been exposed. While there have been few cases reported of HGA disease during pregnancy, all patients have undergone a relatively mild disease course without complications. HGA may cause more severe disease in the elderly and immunocompromised. Herein, we report an unusual presentation and severe disease complications of HGA in a pregnant female who was concomitantly immunocompromised due to azathioprine treatment of her Crohn’s disease. Following successful treatment with rifampin, she subsequently delivered a healthy female infant without any disease sequelae. J Med Cases. 2015;6(6):282-284 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jmc811w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicVector-borne infectious diseasesFrench-language works237,207