RA-EKI: A use case for collaborative logistics planning in coalition force deployment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With greater reliance on coalitions for military force deployment, there is a need for organizational collaboration and system interoperability. Interoperability requires full exchange of data, information (contextualized data) and knowledge (actionable information), which ensures that coalition's members will fully collaborate in synchronizing their logistics plans and processes at all echelons. Existing architecture frameworks, such as NATO's Architecture Framework (NAF) and The Open Group architecture Framework (TOGAF), do not support knowledge management, required to process massive amount of data. In order to perform collaborative logistics planning, logisticians and commanders need to access, in a seamless manner, data and information from several domains from systems within the coalition and from external sources such as social media, government and supplier sites, to name a few. The integrated and structured data must then be transformed into information, or contextualized data, and ultimately into actionable information or knowledge. This paper proposes an innovative approach, the Reference Architecture of an Enterprise Knowledge Infrastructure (RA-EKI) that provides a holistic and integrative approach to manage the complete unstructured data to knowledge lifecycle applicable to military logistics planning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it