MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1618658579 · doi:10.1086/324108

Polarimetric Variations of Binary Stars. III. Periodic Polarimetric Variations of the Herbig A[CLC]e[/CLC]/B[CLC]e[/CLC] Star MWC 1080

2001· article· en· W1618658579 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCircumbinary planetPosition anglePolarimetryPolarization (electrochemistry)Herbig Ae/Be starBinary starBinary numberLinear polarizationStarsOrbital eccentricity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present polarimetric observations of a massive pre–main-sequence short-period binary star of the Herbig Ae/Be type, MWC 1080. The mean polarization at 7660 Å is 1.60% at 81 6, or 0.6% at 139° if an estimate of the interstellar polarization is subtracted. The intrinsic polarization points to an asymmetric geometry of the circumstellar or circumbinary environment while the 139° intrinsic position angle traces the axis of symmetry of the system and is perpendicular to the position angle of the outflow cavity. The polarization and its position angle are clearly variable, at all wavelengths, and on timescales of hours, days, months, and years. Stochastic variability is accompanied by periodic variations caused by the orbital motion of the stars in their dusty environment. These periodic polarimetric variations are the first phased-locked ones detected for a pre–main-sequence binary. The variations are not simply double-periodic (seen twice per orbit) but include single-periodic (seen once per orbit) and higher order variations. The presence of single-periodic variations could be due to non equal mass stars, the presence of dust grains, an asymmetric configuration of the circumstellar or circumbinary material, or the eccentricity of the orbit. MWC 1080 is an eclipsing binary with primary and secondary eclipses occurring at phases 0.0 and 0.55. The signatures of the eclipses are seen in the polarimetric observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207