PLANETARY WAVES AS A TRANSPORT MEDIUM OF EUROPEAN NOCTILUCENT CLOUDS AFTER THE TUNGUSKA EVENT OF 1908.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Antarctic Institute of Canada (PO Box 1223, MPO, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5J - 2M4. amardon@shaw.ca), Following the Tunguska explosion of 30 June 1908, the source of which was likely a massive stony meteorite, noctilucent clouds (NLC) were reported in Europe, and it has been suggested that these NLC were a direct result of increased meteoric nuclei introduced by the impacting body[1]. It has been pointed out the significance of planetary waves as a transport mechanism for atmospheric conditions favourable for NLC formation. Since these waves are known to move from east to west[2]the formation of NLC in Europe could have very well been due to planetary wave transport of attendant atmospheric physical conditions, if not the meteoric nuclei as well, from the site of the Tunguska impact much farther east in Asia. This might be the mechanism for the transport of NLC phenomena around the world in progressive times. NLC’s in the Americas might even have the same time delay.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".