MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1618835985 · doi:10.1109/nssmic.1995.504225

A pipeline controller for the ATLAS calorimeter

2002· article· en· W1618835985 on OpenAlexaff
D. M. Gingrich, J.C. Hewlett, L. Holm, J. L. Pinfold

Bibliographic record

Venue1995 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipeline (software)Computer scienceComputer hardwarePipeline transportController (irrigation)Atlas (anatomy)DetectorRandom accessElectrical engineeringEmbedded systemReal-time computingEngineeringOperating systemTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One approach to the front-end readout of the ATLAS liquid argon calorimeter is to store data locally in analog pipeline memories at the LHC beam-crossing frequency of 40 MHz. Proto-type pipeline chips using switched capacitor arrays which meet the ATLAS readout requirements exist. These new chips are capable of simultaneous read and write operations, and allow random access to storage locations. To utilize these essential design features requires a substantial amount of fast control and address bookkeeping logic. We have designed a controller capable of operating the pipelines as analog random access memories and that satisfies the ATLAS readout requirements. The pipeline controller manages the data of 256 time samples and provides dead-time free operation up to a trigger rate of 100 kHz, when reading out five time samples per event. This operation allows 2 /spl mu/s for the output reconstruction amplifiers to settle and should be sufficient to achieve the required 13-bit resolution. We are currently proto-typing a second PC-board version of our controller. The implementation of an integrated version based on the same design is in progress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue1995 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference RecordSame topicParticle Detector Development and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207