The Research on the Super Heavy Oil Reservoir Characteristics of Du 84 Block in Liaohe Oilfield
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reservoir characteristics of super heavy oil directly determine the development effects of heavy oil thermal recovery. The development process of super heavy oil reservoir in Du 84 block contains the production test of steam huff and puff-the industrialization of steam huff and puff-the production test of SAGD-the industrialization of SAGD. The researches on the reservoir characteristics carried out at the early stage of the reservoir development have partly guiding significance for the reservoir development and deployment. As the development progress, we need describe the reservoir characteristics of super heavy oil once more in order to guide the deployment of thermal well network. This article makes a detailed and reliable description of reservoir characteristics of super heavy oil and provides fundamental data support for the next dynamic regulation by doing a statistical analysis of the characteristics of sand body distribution, petrology, physical property and aeolotropy of the Guantao formation and the Xinglongtai reservoir [1,2] . Key words: Super heavy oil; Du 84 block; Reservoir characteristics; Guantao formation; Xinglongtai reservoir
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".