Pajanan Kebisingan dan Hipertensi di Kalangan Pekerja Pelabuhan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penyakit kardiovaskular menempati urutan ke-4 atau 15% dari penyebab kematian yang berhubungan dengan pekerjaan. Hipertensi yang merupakan salah satu penyakit pembuluh darah, dikenal sebagai silent killer karena sering tidak menimbulkan gejala. Sebagian besar penderita hipertensi di Indonesia tidak terdeteksi, sementara mereka yang terdeteksi umumnya tidak menyadari kondisi penyakitnya dan hanya sebagian kecil yang berobat secara teratur. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui prevalensi hipertensi pada pekerja pelabuhan di wilayah kerja Kantor Kesehatan Pelabuhan Kelas II Tarakan serta faktor-faktor risiko yang berpengaruh. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah potong lintang; subjek diperoleh dari hasil survei penyakit tidak menular tahun 2011 oleh Kantor Kesehatan Pelabuhan Tarakan. Subjek yang terkumpul adalah 361 pekerja. Nilai pengukuran tekanan darah menggunakan nilai baku dari JNC VII tahun 2003. Prevalensi hipertensi ditemukan lebih rendah daripada angka nasional dan provinsi, yaitu 21,88%. Pajanan kebisingan dikaitkan dengan usia, riwayat keluarga hipertensi, stres, indeks massa tubuh dan berhubungan dengan hipertensi.Cardiovascular disease range ranks fourth or 15 % of the causes of death related to job. Hipertension is one of cardiovascular disease thet is known as silent killer because of lack of simptom. Most of hypertension patients in Indonesia are not detected, while they are whose detected do not conscious their disease condition and only little who get the treatment regularly. The objective of this study was to know the prevalence and risk factors of hypertension among harbor worker at Port Health Office Class II of Tarakan with it’s associated risk factors. The study design used was crosssectional. The study used secondary data source of noncommunicable disease survey, 2011 at Port Health Office of Tarakan. The subjects were 361 workers. Value of blood pressure measurement using the raw value of the JNC VII IN 2003. The prevalence of hypertension were found lower than national and province indicator score, 21,88%. Noise exposure is associated with hypertension together with age, family hypertension history, stress, body mass index.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".