MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1620089381 · doi:10.1109/iwcmc.2015.7289172

Decode-and-Forward vehicular relaying for 2×2 MIMO LTE-advanced downlink

2015· article· en· W1620089381 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed F. Feteiha, Hossam S. Hassanein

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMIMOSpatial multiplexingComputer scienceTelecommunications link3G MIMOAntenna diversityWirelessDiversity gainOrthogonalityMulti-user MIMOCooperative MIMOSpace–time block codeComputer networkMultiplexingTelecommunicationsMathematicsChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MIMO is a key technology in improving the performance of wireless communications. Recently the concept of cooperative communication has emerged as a solution to exploit the potential gains of MIMO on a distributed scale. We propose to use cooperative-MIMO links in LTE-A networks where vehicles act as relaying terminals to a designated vehicle using Decode-and-Forward relaying. To maintain orthogonality of signals, a modified Alamouti-based Space-Time Block Coding (STBC) technique is proposed. Our approach allows exploitation of the multiplexing capability and spatial diversity of typical MIMO schemes in distributed way. We further contribute by deriving error rate and diversity gain as a benchmark to assess our analysis and future research studies. Our findings indicate that significant diversity gains and reduced error rates are achievable. As well, a noticeable reduction in the required transmitting power are observed compared to traditional single antenna deployment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCooperative Communication and Network Coding→French-language works237,207→