MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1620600268 · doi:10.3917/retm.246.0065

Hannah Arendt et Dorothee Sölle

2007· article· fr· W1620600268 on OpenAlexaff
Monique Dumais

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d éthique et de théologie morale · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEvelyn Waugh and Hans Urs von Balthasar Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Les écrits de deux penseuses allemandes, Hannah Arendt et Dorothee Sölle, offrent un terrain de rencontre avec Dietrich Bonhoeffer sur l’aspect de l’obéissance dans sa relation à la responsabilité et aussi par rapport au mal. Tous les trois ont connu l’action incandescente du nazisme en Europe, ce qui a marqué leurs réflexions de façon évidente. L’éthique concrète de Bonhoeffer sollicite une responsabilité immédiate où « le Christ prend forme par nous, hic et nunc ». Au procès d’Eichmann à Jérusalem, Hannah Arendt ne peut qu’être envahie par le constat de « l’impensable banalité du mal ». En somme, c’est toute une compréhension de l’obéissance qui est en cause. Dorothee Sölle de son côté a su établir des distinctions significatives sur l’obéissance dans Imagination et obéissance (Phantasie und Gehorsam).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d éthique et de théologie moraleSame topicEvelyn Waugh and Hans Urs von Balthasar StudiesFrench-language works237,207