Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper is concerned with the asymptotic distribution of Laplace eigenvalues on Liouville tori. Liouville metrics are the largest known class of integrable metrics on two-dimensional tori; they contain flat metrics and metrics of revolution as special cases. Using separation of variables, we reduce the eigenvalue counting problem to the problem of counting lattice points in certain planar domains. This allows us to improve the remainder estimate in Weyl's law on a large class of Liouville tori. For flat metrics, such an estimate has been known for more than a century due to classical results of W. Sierpiski and J.G. van der Corput. Our proof combines the method of Y. Colin de Verdire, who proved an analogous result for metrics of revolution on a sphere, with the techniques developed by P. Bleher, D. Kosygin, A. Minasov and Y. Sinai in their study of the almost periodic properties of the remainder in Weyl's law on Liouville tori.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".