MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W162076762

The Marriage Deal Between a Young Finnish-Saame Man and a Former Russian Prostitute in Northern Finland

2003· article· en· W162076762 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Elina Penttinen

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian women's studies · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSex work and related issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeFishingGlobalizationGender studiesGeographyPopulationHistorySociologyEthnologyPolitical scienceDemographyLawArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This story stems from my field research on prostitution and trafficking in Russian women in northern Finland. This fictive narrative constructed from interviews with a young Finnish-Saame man in which he told me about his involvement with organized prostitution in the region aims to show how globalization concretizes at the local level and more specifically on gendered bodies. I could start telling this story by explaining what happened last week when the cops came and searched his house for drugs. Or when this guy unfortunately maybe arrogantly gambled his fishing boat to the man from the South. These events are consequences of previous events. So lets go further back in time a few months. Lets go back to early summer to the time before the fishing season. These events take place in the beginning of June 2001 in Utsjoki at the northern border across the river from Norway closer to the eastern border than to south of Finland. (excerpt)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.263
Threshold uncertainty score0.523

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0420.009
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian women's studiesSame topicSex work and related issuesFrench-language works237,207