Multiple working mode approach to manipulation of unknown mechanisms using a serial robot: A special case of constrained motion with active and passive joints
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tasks for robots such as opening doors and drawers, and operation of cranks and levers in an unstructured environment pose a challenge for robot control due to unmodelled constraints. A constrained robot manipulator is an over-actuated system in which kinematic modelling errors lead to high internal and external reaction forces. In this work, problems caused by modelling inaccuracies are avoided by reducing the number of position-controlled joints during task execution, such that the number of generalized inputs matches the task degrees of freedom. In this configuration, the manipulator is a minimally actuated system, where the uncontrolled generalized coordinates are task-actuated (passive). We present two criteria for the assignment of active and passive control modes; one based on the coordinate partitioning method for multibody dynamics, and another that that minimizes task friction forces. Simulation results are presented for the case of 1-DOF constrained motion along an elliptical trajectory, similar to a crank turning task.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".