MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1621589456 · doi:10.1029/2005gc001166

Growth history of a diffusely venting sulfide structure from the Juan de Fuca Ridge: A petrological and geochemical study

2006· article· en· W1621589456 on OpenAlexaff
Brian Kristall, Deborah S. Kelley, Mark D. Hannington, John R. Delaney

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochemistry Geophysics Geosystems · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySulfideGeochemistryHydrothermal circulationPyriteSulfide mineralsMineralogyHydrothermal ventVolcanogenic massive sulfide ore depositMatrix (chemical analysis)Materials scienceComposite materialPaleontologySphalerite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Centimeter‐scale mineralogical and chemical analyses of a diffusely venting, ∼280°C sulfide structure (called Roane) from the Mothra Hydrothermal Field on the Juan de Fuca Ridge reveal a complex growth history. These analyses document four well‐defined zones, which from the exterior to the interior of the structure include a barite‐silica zone (Fossil Worm Tube Zone), a silica‐sulfide zone (Silica Zone), a sulfide‐silica zone (Outer Sulfide Zone), and a sulfide ± gordaite ± silica zone (Inner Sulfide Zone). These features are a product of a myriad of processes that include extensive mineral replacement, ingress of seawater, fracturing and breakout of hot hydrothermal fluids, significant conductive cooling, and the sustained, broad‐scale outflow of warm fluids from the walls through a porous and permeable matrix. Roane lacks an open, throughgoing, chalcopyrite‐lined, central conduit. Instead, it hosts an anastomosing, discontinuous network of tortuous channels within the interior of a sponge‐like matrix of amorphous silica, sulfide, sulfate, and clay minerals. Megafaunal communities at the summit and sides of this mature, diffusely venting chimney provide a constructional framework for new growth. Isolation of hydrothermal fluid from seawater during progressive fossilization of megafauna and the early formation of barite‐silica assemblages promote flow of higher‐temperature fluids within the interior. Continued isolation of interior higher‐temperature fluids, through increased mineral precipitation and expansion of the structure, leads to a Zn sulfide + pyrite‐dominated permeable matrix and a network of tortuous channels that form a central porous conduit. This conduit is shielded by a weakly silicified, metal sulfide inner wall and a strongly silicified outer wall. The most outer portions of the walls are highly porous and sites of significant advection and mixing between hydrothermal fluids and seawater. The mineralogy and chemistry of Roane are strongly affected by ammonia‐ammonium buffering of the pH during cooling of the hydrothermal fluids. The two major results of the buffering are (1) precipitation of Zn sulfide at higher temperatures than are typical for bare‐rock systems, leading to the correlation of Cu, Zn, Cd, and Se and (2) increased deposition of amorphous silica and clay minerals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.161
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations72
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeochemistry Geophysics GeosystemsSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207