Micromagnetics of paleomagnetically significant mineral grains with complex morphology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Micromagnetic calculations relevant to paleomagnetism have generally focused on ideal shapes such as spheres and cubes. However, oxide grains that occur naturally in rocks often have irregular morphologies, highly skeletal dendritic forms being particularly common. To investigate the potential effects of complex grain morphology on magnetic stability, we have carried out two parallel sets of calculations. The first is based on randomly distorted 30–120 nm magnetite spheres. We use a three‐dimensional finite element/boundary integral micromagnetic model able to generate suitable morphologies unrestricted by the regular cell structure required by finite difference models. The second model consists of a 300 nm magnetite octahedron from which most of the material has been removed to leave a small octahedral crystallite at each of the six apices connected by an orthogonal framework of thin rods. The results obtained imply that micromagnetic models currently provide no unambiguous evidence that morphological complexities endow magnetite nanoparticles with enhanced coercivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".