MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1622338042 · doi:10.29173/cjs1525

Radical Neoliberalism in British Columbia: Remaking Rural Geographies

2008· article· en· W1622338042 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Nathan Young

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Sociology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCooperative Studies and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNeoliberalism (international relations)Political sciencePoliticsEconomySociologyPolitical economyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radical Neoliberalism in British Columbia: Remaking Rural Geographies
 
 Abstract Abstract. This paper argues that rural regions of British Columbia, Canada, are currently the subject of a radical political-economic experiment dismantling traditional Fordist and Keynesian approaches to economic development and replacing them with neoliberal strategies. This experiment targets both corporate resource economies and local or community-based economies. The paper argues that current reforms aim to enhance flexibility in major resource sectors (particularly in forestry) by “liberating” corporate actors from traditional obligations to environment, labour, and communities. This strategy is buttressed by concurrent reforms to community development policies to promote “entrepreneurial” forms of development that (it is assumed) can be achieved independently of the dominant resource economy. Using field research from several case communities in coastal British Columbia, the paper argues that these developments are having a strong impact on traditional economic structures and practices, as neoliberal reforms seek to disaggregate corporate and community-level economies.
 Résumé. Cet article propose que les régions rurales de la Colombie Britannique, sont présentement le sujet d’une expérience politique radicale qui comprend le démantèlement des institutions et stratégies de développement économique fordistes et keynésiennes traditionnelles et leur remplacement par des approches néolibérales. Cette expérience cible les économies industrielles (basées sur les ressources naturels) comme les économies locales des communautés rurales. Cet article propose que la stratégie néolibérale naissante vise d’abord à libérer les grandes entreprises impliquées dans l’extraction de ressources naturelles de leurs obligations traditionnelles envers l’environnement, la main-d’oeuvre, et les communautés rurales. Cette stratégie est étayée par des réformes simultanées des politiques de développement communautaires qui favorisent l’entrepreneurial, en indépendance supposée de l’économie existante dominés par les ressources naturelles. Fondé sur une recherche de terrain dans plusieurs communautés côtières en Colombie Britannique, cet article propose que l’expérience néolibérale a un effet important sur les structures et les pratiques économiques traditionnelles, en ce qu’elle tente de désagréger les économies industrielles et communautaires dans les régions rurales de la province.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0240.013
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of SociologySame topicCooperative Studies and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207