MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1622338042 · doi:10.29173/cjs1525

Radical Neoliberalism in British Columbia: Remaking Rural Geographies

2008· article· en· W1622338042 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Sociology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCooperative Studies and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNeoliberalism (international relations)Political sciencePoliticsEconomySociologyPolitical economyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radical Neoliberalism in British Columbia: Remaking Rural Geographies
 
 Abstract Abstract. This paper argues that rural regions of British Columbia, Canada, are currently the subject of a radical political-economic experiment dismantling traditional Fordist and Keynesian approaches to economic development and replacing them with neoliberal strategies. This experiment targets both corporate resource economies and local or community-based economies. The paper argues that current reforms aim to enhance flexibility in major resource sectors (particularly in forestry) by “liberating” corporate actors from traditional obligations to environment, labour, and communities. This strategy is buttressed by concurrent reforms to community development policies to promote “entrepreneurial” forms of development that (it is assumed) can be achieved independently of the dominant resource economy. Using field research from several case communities in coastal British Columbia, the paper argues that these developments are having a strong impact on traditional economic structures and practices, as neoliberal reforms seek to disaggregate corporate and community-level economies.
 Résumé. Cet article propose que les régions rurales de la Colombie Britannique, sont présentement le sujet d’une expérience politique radicale qui comprend le démantèlement des institutions et stratégies de développement économique fordistes et keynésiennes traditionnelles et leur remplacement par des approches néolibérales. Cette expérience cible les économies industrielles (basées sur les ressources naturels) comme les économies locales des communautés rurales. Cet article propose que la stratégie néolibérale naissante vise d’abord à libérer les grandes entreprises impliquées dans l’extraction de ressources naturelles de leurs obligations traditionnelles envers l’environnement, la main-d’oeuvre, et les communautés rurales. Cette stratégie est étayée par des réformes simultanées des politiques de développement communautaires qui favorisent l’entrepreneurial, en indépendance supposée de l’économie existante dominés par les ressources naturelles. Fondé sur une recherche de terrain dans plusieurs communautés côtières en Colombie Britannique, cet article propose que l’expérience néolibérale a un effet important sur les structures et les pratiques économiques traditionnelles, en ce qu’elle tente de désagréger les économies industrielles et communautaires dans les régions rurales de la province.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.524
Threshold uncertainty score0.564

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it