MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1622487778

THE DETERMINATION OF THE SMALL METEORIC BODIES SIZES

2008· article· en· W1622487778 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
N. V. Popelenskaya

Bibliographic record

VenueAsteroids, Comets, Meteors 2008 · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtmosphere (unit)MechanicsPhysicsGeologyMeteorology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dynamic method of the determination of the small meteoric body’s parameters is based on the analysis of the trajectory shone site at movement in an atmosphere with use of the given observation of speed and height [1]. Dynamic method has essential restriction impossibility of its application for small meteors which speed does not vary at an atmosphere movement, or varies it is not enough, as it is based on change of speed. The solution of a weight definition problem of small meteoric bodies with use of some principles of a dynamic method is considered in current research. Movement of small meteoric bodies occurs in a free molecular mode and partially in a transitive mode at which the thin viscous boundary layer of the fused material of a body and it vapor is formed. The basic mechanism of destruction for small meteors is evaporation. The solution is based that at such flow of small meteoric bodies a blackout condition means full destruction. Expression for a determination of the body size at an atmosphere input turns out from a condition of zero weight in last point of an observable site of a luminescence. For constant speed this expression turns out from the equation of weight loss, and at little change of speed is used asymptotic expression at great values of the ablation parameter for the decision of the meteoric physics equations. For determination of the body size values of heattransfer coefficient, drag coefficient and heat of ablation are calculated. For calculations values of blackout height and speeds were used at movement in an atmosphere from the given observation Canadian and Prairie cameras networks [2, 3]. It is supposed, that meteoric bodies have the spherical form and the density corresponding a stone (3,73 g/sm 3 ). It is shown, that for small meteors the radius of a bodies does not exceed one centimeter, and at absence of braking - no more than 3 mm. The drag coefficient at a free molecular flow is equal to two, in a transitive mode varies from 1,5 up to 2. Thus the heattransfer coefficient exchange in a range from 0,1 up to 0,2. All this allows to allocate small meteors in a separate class with following characteristics: movement in an atmosphere can be registered by photogauges, the entry speeds makes not less than 18 km/s, the blackout heights not below 66 km. Comparison of the results received in work with data about weights of the small meteors calculated on observable luminosity and resulted in tables of the Canadian and Prairie cameras networks supervision is lead [2, 3].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsteroids, Comets, Meteors 2008→Same topicAstro and Planetary Science→French-language works237,207→