MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1622606484 · doi:10.3171/jns.2000.93.5.0891

Endoscopically guided fenestration of the choroidal fissure for treatment of trapped temporal horn

2000· article· en· W1622606484 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew G. Parrent

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of neurosurgery · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHydrocephalusFrench hornShunt (medical)FenestrationSurgeryEndoscopyMeningitisRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years endoscopic procedures have been used more frequently to treat loculated hydrocephalus. The trapped temporal horn, a specific type of loculation, has traditionally been treated by means of ventricular shunt placement. By opening up loculations, however, this procedure can be simplified or, in some cases, even avoided. In this report the author discusses a case of trapped temporal horn that was caused by fungal meningitis and treated using endoscopically guided fenestration of the choroidal fissure, leading to clinical and radiographic resolution of the syndrome. Using this simple procedure allows the surgeon to take advantage of normal temporal horn anatomy and landmarks, avoiding the scarred and distorted region of ventricular obstruction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of neurosurgerySame topicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusFrench-language works237,207