MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1622778297 · doi:10.1063/1.1609633

Characterization of amorphous GexSi1−xOy for micromachined uncooled bolometer applications

2003· article· en· W1622778297 on OpenAlexaff
Arbaz Ahmed, R. Niall Tait

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThin-Film Transistor Technologies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceSputteringBolometerElectrical resistivity and conductivityGermaniumSiliconAmorphous solidSputter depositionThin filmOptoelectronicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Temperature coefficientOxygenArgonOpticsNanotechnologyChemistryCrystallographyComposite materialElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thin films of GexSi1−xOy were prepared by reactive magnetron sputtering using simultaneous sputtering of silicon and germanium targets in an environment of oxygen and argon. Silicon and oxygen content were varied from 0 to 30 at. % separately and the effect of the addition of each element on electrical and optical properties of amorphous germanium was studied. The electrical and optical behavior of the compound with varying elemental composition is explained based on the oxidation behavior of the Si and Ge. Increasing the silicon content was found to inhibit the formation of germanium–oxygen bonds. Values of temperature coefficient of resistance as high as −5% K−1 were obtained at moderate resistivity values around 3.8×104 Ω cm. These characteristics could be used to enhance the performance of micromachined uncooled bolometers. The composition control enabled by cosputtering components allows resistivity and activation energy to be tailored to suit different design specifications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.338
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicThin-Film Transistor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207