MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1623157779 · doi:10.1029/2003pa000926

Neoproterozoic “snowball Earth”: Dynamic sea ice over a quiescent ocean

2003· article· en· W1623157779 on OpenAlexaff
J. P. Lewis, Andrew J. Weaver, Stephen T. Johnston, Michael Eby

Bibliographic record

VenuePaleoceanography · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowball EarthGeologyGlacial periodSea iceClimatologyGlacierForcing (mathematics)OceanographyEarth sciencePaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Low‐latitude sea level glacial deposits suggest the existence of “snowball Earth” conditions in the Neoproterozoic. Previous modeling studies have offered conflicting support for the snowball hypothesis. We use a climate model of intermediate complexity, including an ocean GCM and a sophisticated thermodynamic/dynamic sea ice component, to conduct a suite of experiments with different orbital/paleogeographical configurations, wind‐forcing, and atmospheric CO2 levels. We show that depending on the orbital configuration and paleogeography, snowball conditions prevail even with atmospheric CO2 levels up to 1800 ppmv. Overall, our modeling paradigm is consistent with the original snowball hypothesis in which an ice covered ocean surrounds a largely snow and ice‐free barren land, with some coastal regions permitting the growth of thick glaciers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaleoceanographySame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207