Étude de la classification des souffrances à distance de Luc Boltanski
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette recherche porte sur la perception qu’ont les adultes des changements survenus dans leur vie et dans la societe. Selonune methodologiemixtedelarecherche,504adultesdelaVille deQuebec ont participea cetteetude internationale. Dans le cadre de cet article, nous nous interessons a la notion de la souffrance a distance de Luc Boltanski, c’est-a-dire la souffrance des autres qui s’integre dans le soi historique des individus. L’analyse quantitative, des evenements et changements sociohistoriques marquants pour les participants, montre l’importance des evenements terroristes du 11 septembre 2001, suivis des referendums sur l’independance du Quebec. L’analyse de contenu, centree sur le vecu et la gestion des souffrances a distance, valide la portee heuristique de la classification de Boltanski.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".