Bibliographic record
Abstract
Yakup Kadri Karaosmanoglu, a leading novelists of “national literature” period is a name who has stood out in every period due to innovations he has brought to the Turkish novel. His novels as Mansion for Rent, Father Nur, The Wild, Ankara, Evening of Decree Sodom and Gomorra, An Exile, Panorama I and Panorama II and Always The Same Song and some other works of prose, stories and memories are among some of his works. Novels written through Yakup Kadri Karaosmanoglu, and in particular his novel styled “Ankara” includes certain values and concepts thereby creating works with literary significance. The author has employed his neighborhood, quarter, city and the people from different walks of life from different parts of the country while creating his works and continued this approach in his novel styled “Ankara” and has reflected the nature of the Anatolian people and the situation of Ankara during the National Struggle. The heroes of the novel, settings and the reflections of the war are explained in an impressive language and psychology of people and their changing lives and attitudes also included. This study aims to evaluate this novel on which many articles have been written and many studies have been conducted by many researchers one more time in today’s conditions and see more clearly the point our country has reached in terms of literature more clearly. The subject of the work, the main protagonists, different moods of the heroes and changes thereof constitute the center of our study. We will examine the novel considering the foregoing with a critical attitude and reveal our views through employment of the author’s point of view and the views of different researchers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".