MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W162540017 · doi:10.3233/pic-2012-016

Caffeine in bronchiolitis associated apnea: A retrospective cohort study

2015· article· en· W162540017 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Intensive Care · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityWestern University
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsMedicineBronchiolitisMechanical ventilationApneaIntubationAnesthesiaRetrospective cohort studyApnea of prematurityVentilation (architecture)CohortPediatricsRespiratory systemSurgeryGestational ageInternal medicinePregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

= 0.01). Only one patient who was initially managed with non-invasive ventilation was subsequently intubated. There was no difference in the duration of total respiratory support, duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, hospital and pediatric critical care unit stay. All infants survived. This study does not provide adequate evidence to support or refute the routine use of caffeine in bronchiolitis associated apnea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it