MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1625427727 · doi:10.3917/riges.342.0037

Gestion des informations sur un site Web

2009· article· fr· W1625427727 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Sylvie Héroux, Christiane Demers

Bibliographic record

VenueGestion · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBusiness Strategy and Innovation
Canadian institutionsHEC MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesWeb siteBusinessGeographyThe InternetArtComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Le Web offre aux entreprises une occasion de se démarquer des concurrents. Vu son contenu informationnel, le site Web d’une organisation peut inciter les investisseurs, les clients, les employés, les fournisseurs, les groupes politiques et la communauté en général à devenir ou à demeurer ses partenaires d’affaires. Les résultats d’une étude menée auprès d’organisations canadiennes permettent de dégager quatre profils de gestion du contenu informationnel d’un site Web : les finances (actionnaires, investisseurs), le marketing (consommateurs, clients), le capital humain (employeur de choix, responsabilité sociale) et le tableau de bord (capital humain, marketing, finances). Finalement, l’article traite des implications de cette typologie de sites Web pour les gestionnaires et les dirigeants des organisations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.008
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGestionSame topicBusiness Strategy and InnovationFrench-language works237,207