MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1626137557

Comportamiento de la economía y del mercado de trabajo en Colombia durante el periodo 1950-2005

2008· preprint· es· W1626137557 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Oscar Hernan Muñoz

Bibliographic record

VenueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2008
Typepreprint
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEconomic and Social Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Welfare economicsPopulationWork (physics)EconomicsEconomyDistribution (mathematics)GeographySociologyEngineeringDemography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Los mercados de trabajo desempenan diversos papeles en las economías modernas. Por una parte, permiten determinar que tan ecaz es la asignación de recursos laborales y de otros factores indirectos en la sociedad. Por otra, constituyen uno de los principales mecanismos de obtención de ingresos por parte de la población activa. Por ello, los mercados de trabajo están en estrecha relación con la distribución de ingresos y el bienestar de la población en general. Siguiendo estas líneas conceptuales, se exploran las principales características de la economía y del mercado de trabajo en Colombia entre 1950 y 2005. En la primera parte, se investiga la evolución de la estructura económica colombiana, colocando especial atención en el manejo de la política económica y sus implicaciones para los diferentes sectores productivos. En la segunda, se analizan las tendencias del mercado de trabajo y sus situaciones problemáticas. En la tercera, se hace una breve referencia al proceso de transición laboral y, nalmente, en la cuarta parte se avanzan algunas conclusiones pertinentes a la problemática tratada en las tres primeras partes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.617
Threshold uncertainty score0.772

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsSame topicEconomic and Social DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207