James VI's Ius Suum Conservare: His Intrigues with Spain, 1580-1603
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Who can think of the sixteenth century without contemplating James VI of Scotland as one of the central figures around whom all contemporary persons, events, and circumstances tangled?His characteristic virtues and defects, his sympathies and antipathies, his very whims and caprices are writ large across the political history of Scotland and Europe.It is his figure that has made the sixteenth century the period of Scottish annals that has commanded the attention of the world.For over four centuries, historians and researchers from all over the world have tried to study, analyse, explain and understand his character and his fortunes as man and king.Even to this day James still remains one of the most controversial characters in history, admired and reviled in equal measure; but in strictest truth, it may be said that James's rule was one of the most momentous periods in the history of Scotland.James's contribution to the shaping of modern political and diplomatic theory and practice has been the subject of scholarly debate throughout the twentieth century.Michael Lynch, Julian Goodare, Pauline Croft, and Maurice Lee, are among many whom have been captivated by the charismatic Scottish sovereign.Although many
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".