MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1626776223

The Measure of the Earth -- A Saskatchewan Diary

2005· article· en· W1626776223 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martin Beech

Bibliographic record

VenueJRASC · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicSocioeconomics of Resources and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLEAPSGeniusMeasure (data warehouse)Earth (classical element)Shadow (psychology)Simple (philosophy)GeographyGeologyHistoryArt historyPhilosophyEpistemologyComputer sciencePsychologyPhysicsAstronomyPsychoanalysisEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When I first learnt as a young schoolboy how Eratosthenes had determined the size of the Earth by comparing the length of shadows cast at two different locations, I was enthralled. The concept was so very, very simple (as, indeed, are all leaps of genius once explained) and yet it was also so powerful. I reveled in the shear audacity of the idea from shadow lengths to the circumference of the Earth. Here was the stamp of human imagination, and here was the ‘measure in all things’ as espoused by Horace.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score0.918

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJRASCSame topicSocioeconomics of Resources and ConservationFrench-language works237,207