Sill emplacement in a plateau: examples from the Coast Mountains, British Columbia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Coast plutonic complex of British Columbia exposes the middle crust of a magmatic arc formed in the late Cretaceous and early Cenozoic. It provides one of the best analogues for processes in modern orogenic plateau undergoing vigorous magmatism, such as the PunaAltiplano. Here we focus on gently dipping sill-like plutons that intruded amphibolite to granulite facies gneiss (central gneiss complex). Near the Skeena River, mineral assemblages in country rocks of the sills track uplift and exhumation from pressures of ~800 MPa to 200 MPa during sill emplacement between ~75 and 50 Ma. The gently to moderately dipping fabrics that host the sills are the result of transposition of an earlier steeply dipping foliation. Sill emplacement occurred during both contractional and extensional deformation as indicated by a reversal in shear observed at a regional scale. The sills are concordant with host rock foliations and mutually crosscutting relationships show that sill emplacement occurred during foliation transposition. Individual sills range in scale from centimeters to kilometers in thickness, with the largest sills traceable for tens of kilometers along strike. Host rock gneiss in many regions are dominated by orthogneiss suggesting much of the crustal column within the central gneiss complex has plutonic protoliths, particularly south of Douglas Channel. This indicates that much of the crust was constructed by repeated episodes of sill injection. However, country rock sills found to the south of Douglas Channel do not appear to have decompressed as rapidly as in the north, and magnitude of high-temperature decompression appears to have been of smaller magnitude. Our results show that heat transported by the plutons into partially molten rock weakened host rocks allowing foliation transposition and strain localization to the margins of the sill complexes. Similar processes are likely to occur in plateau undergoing vigorous magmatism and may be similar to geophysically inferred magma bodies beneath Tibet and the Altiplano.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".