Bibliographic record
Abstract
According to the “Kabyle myth,” elderly Kabyle immigrant women have “more freedom” than women in other immigrant communities. However, a closer look at the myth and at the practices of these women reveals that this is no longer the case. Indeed, women of Kabyle origin now share the “dual condition” – that of being old and immigrant – of all elderly women from North Africa and other immigrant communities. Using information obtained from elderly women of Kabyle origin living in France, this article shows how the ambivalence of their territorial attachment – to their home villages and to the societies where they now live – reflects their difficulty in living as poor individuals in a society. It also provides some answers to a question commonly encountered in the sociology of migration: how do elderly women deal with the possibility of a future return to their homeland? Most of these women came to France from the 1970s to join family members already living there. Others, on the other hand, came for economic reasons. Married, widowed, single or divorced, these women previously held a job and are now pensioners or housewives. How do they integrate into French society? What relations do they maintain with their home country?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".