MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1628092717 · doi:10.4000/pistes.1721

La formation visant la prise en charge globale des troubles musculo-squelettiques par l’entreprise : une étude exploratoire

2011· article· fr· W1628092717 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Valérie Tremblay-Boudreault, Nicole Vézina, Denys Denis, Yannick Tousignant‐Laflamme

Bibliographic record

VenuePerspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santé · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Un plan de formation a été développé et implanté selon une approche d’ergonomie participative, afin de favoriser la prévention des troubles musculo-squelettiques et la gestion du maintien et du retour au travail par une entreprise de caoutchouc. Les impacts du plan de formation ont été observés sous l’angle des changements de représentation, de la philosophie d’intégration des travailleurs et du développement des compétences à l’interne. Le principal apport de notre intervention réside dans le fait d’avoir combiné la prévention et le retour au travail au plan de formation. Compte tenu du peu de ressources spécialisées en santé et sécurité du travail et aucune en ergonomie, une collaboration entre les acteurs internes et des ressources externes apparait essentielle pour optimiser la prise en charge globale de la prévention des TMS par l’entreprise, en particulier dans un contexte alliant des ressources financières limitées, une population vieillissante de travailleurs et un niveau de contraintes élevé.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.378
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePerspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santéSame topicHealth, Medicine and SocietyFrench-language works237,207