MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1628276498 · doi:10.5380/contra.v1i0.12038

Hegel e o problema do Saber absoluto na Fenomenologia do Espírito, ou: de como a consciência-de-si do Espírito se torna objeto de sua consciência?

2008· article· pt· W1628276498 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueContradictio · 2008
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhilosophical Thought and Analysis
Canadian institutionsAdidas (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trata-se de uma consideração especulativa em torno da instauraçãodo Saber absoluto; mais precisamente, da concepção hegeliana da mesma,apresentada no capítulo final da Phänomenologie des Geistes de 1807.Pretende-se pôr em evidência o caráter autoconstitutivo e autoregulativodos princípios motores do Especulativo puro nos limites de sua instauraçãofenomenológica enquanto Saber absoluto, isto é, como pano de fundo– implícito – da mesma; ou ainda, de modo mais rigoroso, da determinaçãoda estrutura imanente – lógico-efetiva – do Saber absoluto, aliás, domodo como a consciência-de-si do Espírito se torna objeto de sua consciência.Com o que, ao fim e ao cabo, poder-se atestar o fato mesmoda Consciência-de-si do Espírito tornar-se objeto de sua Consciência e aconsistência de tal fato, isto é, da instauração do Saber absoluto.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.364
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it