MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1628560151 · doi:10.1109/pesgm.2015.7285745

Online clustering modeling of large-scale photovoltaic power plants

2015· article· en· W1628560151 on OpenAlex
Zhimin Ma, Jinghong Zheng, Shouzhen Zhu, Xinwei Shen, Ling Wei, Xiaoyu Wang, Kun Men

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisPhotovoltaic systemComputer scienceSensitivity (control systems)Data miningMaximum power point trackingScale (ratio)Matching (statistics)Feature (linguistics)Power (physics)InverterArtificial intelligenceElectronic engineeringEngineeringMathematicsVoltageStatisticsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an online clustering modeling method for large-scale photovoltaic (PV) power plants. The proposed method utilizes the defined feature distance of inverter control parameters as the clustering index to derive the equivalent PV plant model. Based on the offline parameter database and the online matching method, the feature distance weighted by online parameter sensitivity is obtained to cluster PV generation units by using the K-means clustering algorithm. The method to acquire equivalent parameters of each clustered PV model is also presented. Simulation results show that the proposed online modeling method is effective and can track the dynamic characteristics of PV power plants accurately.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score0.623

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it