MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1629456883 · doi:10.1029/gm102p0091

Thermal Electron Temperature Measurements from the Freja Cold Plasma Analyzer

2011· book-chapter· en· W1629456883 on OpenAlexaff
D. J. Knudsen, T. D. Phan, Michael D. Gladders, M. Greffen

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical monograph · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser-induced spectroscopy and plasma
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectrum analyzerPlasmaMaterials scienceThermalElectron temperaturePhysicsNuclear physicsOpticsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Freja Cold Plasma Analyzer (CPA) is a hemispherical electrostatic analyzer which forms 2-D, energy/arrival angle images of low-energy (< 200 eV) particle distribution functions. In addition to its 2-D imaging capability, the CPA is unique in that its sensor head is displaced from the spacecraft on a 2 m boom which allows control of the probe-to-plasma potential, thereby compensating for variations in spacecraft potential. Furthermore, the detector biases can be set to measure either positively or negatively charged particle species. This study emphasizes temperature measurements of the core electron population (∼ 1 eV) which are difficult to make since, among other reasons, they are affected by spacecraft charging and are susceptible to contamination from photoelectrons and finite gyroradius effects. We demonstrate that the CPA sensor does detect the core population by showing that probe-to-plasma potential changes of only a fraction of 1 V cause large changes in the electron flux measured at the detector anode. The relation between detector current and sensor bias comprises a modified Langmuir curve, which in contrast to standard Langmuir measurements results from a single particle species only (electrons) and from particles which are restricted in energy (0-70 eV) and in arrival angle to within ±4° of the detector plane. The modified Langmuir curve can be compared to a standard Langmuir curve formed by measuring current onto the external skin of the sensor, which contains contributions from both electrons and ions at all energies and over a wide angular acceptance. Somewhat surprisingly, the two methods agree fairly well in the sunlit portion of a sample orbit, i.e. in the presence of a background photoelectron population, but differ by up to a factor of two in the dark part of the orbit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical monographSame topicLaser-induced spectroscopy and plasmaFrench-language works237,207