MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1629599866 · doi:10.1002/9781118630013.ch5

Using Mathematical Modeling to Integrate Disease Surveillance and Global Air Transportation Data

2014· other· en· W1629599866 on OpenAlex
Julien Arino, Kamran Khan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWiley series in probability and statistics · 2014
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCOVID-19 epidemiological studies
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMeteorologyData scienceGeographyEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modern disease surveillance systems such as the Global Public Health Intelligence Network (GPHIN) generate alerts by continuously monitoring internet news sources for the occurrence of keywords related to infectious diseases. However, all of these alerts do not correspond to events that carry the same potential to generate infectious disease outbreaks in distant locations. In this chapter, we discuss how modeling can help bridge knowledge about health conditions in the locations where the alerts are being generated and the global air transportation network. This serves to assess the potential for an emerging or reemerging disease to quickly spread across large distances and quantify the risk represented to a given public health district by an alert generated elsewhere in the world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.244
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it