MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1629642456

Quand les entreprises produisent du capital social

2009· article· fr· W1629642456 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Éric Forgues, Omer Chouinard, Danièle Courchesne

Bibliographic record

VenueÉconomie rurale · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceRealisationEthnologySociologyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le present article fait suite a une etude d’un cas de cooperation interentreprises entre des boucanieres de la region rurale de Cap-Pele, au Nouveau-Brunswick (Canada). Les auteurs ont voulu examiner la periode de transition entre une situation fortement concurrentielle et une situation de cooperation. Cette transition s’est operee grâce a la creation d’une agence de commercialisation des produits marins des boucanieres. L’examen a porte principalement sur le role du contrat, de l’interet et de la dimension symbolique dans la realisation de cette transition. L’etude fait apparaitre les conditions necessaires a la formation du capital social dans les pratiques economiques a l’etude tout en soulignant l’effet determinant des facteurs utilitaristes, contractualistes, symboliques et normatifs dans la realisation de l’entente de cooperation entre entreprises.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉconomie ruraleSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207