MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1630503348 · doi:10.1086/319958

AB Dor in ’94. I. [ITAL]HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE[/ITAL][ITAL]Hubble Space Telescope[/ITAL] Goddard High Resolution Spectrogaph Observations of the Quiescent Chromosphere of an Active Star

2001· article· en· W1630503348 on OpenAlexaff
J. C. Brandt, Sara Heap, F. M. Walter, E. A. Beaver, A. Boggess, Kenneth G. Carpenter, Dennis Ebbets, J. B. Hutchings, M. Jura, D. S. Leckrone, J. L. Linsky, S. P. Maran, Blair D. Savage, Andrew M. Smith, L. M. Trafton, R. J. Weymann, Dara Norman, Seth Redfield

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsDominion Astrophysical Observatory
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsSpace Telescope Imaging SpectrographEmission spectrumAstronomySpectral lineChromosphereRADIUSLine (geometry)Interstellar mediumStarsHubble space telescopeGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyze Hubble Space Telescope/Goddard High Resolution Spectrograph spectra of AB Doradus, the prototypical, ultrarapidly rotating K dwarf. We observed chromospheric (Mg II) and transition-region (C II, Si IV, C IV, and N V) lines periodically throughout the stellar rotation period and provide a low-dispersion stellar atlas of 78 emission lines. The quiescent line profiles of the chromospheric and transition-region lines show narrow cores superposed on very broad wings. The broad wings of the Mg II k and h lines and of the transition-region lines can be explained by emission from gas corotating with the star and extending out to near the Keplerian corotation radius (2.8 stellar radii). While this is not a unique solution, it is consistent with previous studies of Hα emission, which are naturally explained by large corotating prominences. We find no evidence for rotational modulation of the emission-line fluxes. The density diagnostics suggest that the transition region is formed at constant pressure, with an electron density of 2–3 × 1012 cm-3 at a temperature of 3 × 104 K. The electron pressure is about 100 times larger than that for the quiet Sun. The emission-measure distribution shows a minimum between log T = 5 and 5.5. The Mg II line exhibits three interstellar absorption components along the 15 pc line of sight. We identify the lowest velocity component with the G Cloud, but the other components are not identified with any interstellar clouds previously detected from other lines of sight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207