Bibliographic record
Abstract
La publicaci?n de la biograf?a del pintor cubista inventado Jusep Torres Campalans en i%8 caus? cierto desconcierto entre algunos de sus lectores. La naturaleza ficticia de la novela se oculta tras la forma biogr?fica con tal maestr?a que no resulta f?cil distinguir entre ficci?n y realidad, lo cual provoc? que no siempre se leyera la obra como creaci?n novel?stica. El texto, sin embargo, se encuentra poblado de numerosos datos, alusiones y pistas de diversa ?ndole que ponen de manifiesto la naturaleza par?dica de Jusep Torres Campalans. En efecto, esta biograf?a de artista es tambi?n la parodia de este tipo de obra que critica la creaci?n art?stica y teoriza acerca de ella. La presentaci?n formal de la novela, as? como su fuerte contenido hist?rico, hace de Jusep Torres Campalans una monograf?a de arte; la inexistencia de su protagonista, sin embargo, la convierten en parodia, una parodia que se transmite mediante la tensi?n entre verdad y mentira, realidad y ficci?n.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".