Memorias del golpe: La función de la memoria y la posición simbólica
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolEn el presente texto se aborda el tema de las memorias del Golpe a partir de ciertas distinciones conceptuales en lo que se refiere a la funcion de la memoria. Teniendo en cuenta algunos recuerdos de esa epoca cruenta, se alude al efecto individual y se agrega la interpretacion sobre la influencia simbolica de este periodo en la cultura. Considerando cierta coincidencia entre la ocurrencia de la dictadura y el transito del modernismo al posmodernismo, se postula la existencia de cambios radicales en el campo de lo simbolico que reflejan a la primera como una hipertrofia valorica y violenta de ciertos rasgos del segundo. EnglishThe following work addresses the matter of the Memories of the Coup starting from certain conceptual distinctions regarding the function of memory. Considering some memories of that ferocious time, it refers to the individual effect, no doubt, of them, thus adding to the substance of this article the interpretation of the symbolic influence of this period on culture. Taking into account the coincidence of the occurrence of the Dictatorship with the transition from Modernism to Post Modernism, this article puts forward radical changes in the field of the symbolic reflecting the dictatorship as a violent value hypertrophy of certain features of Modernism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".