MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1631709802 · doi:10.7202/030122ar

Petite fille? Femme?

2006· article· fr· W1631709802 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Élisabeth Bigras

Bibliographic record

VenueSanté mentale au Québec · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Policies and Family
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This moment of a psychoanalytical encounter with a young 9 year old girl seeks, above all, to recount the particular atmosphere which accompanies a meeting of this sort. The term atmosphere is understood to signify the experiential quality associated with the child's psychic reality and with the manner in which it finds expression at the level of fantasy and dreams. Atmosphere also refers to the singularity and style with which the psychic life of this young girl finds expression in the course of her encounter with a female analyst. Also underlined is the utilization of the analyst's counter-transference, which allows her to < > to the flow of the analysis and to respect its unique quality. In this description, one witnesses the manner in which the incestuous < > with the father (the < > motivating her contact with the analyst) masked, in fact, a desire on the part of the young girl for a drawing nearer to, and a feminine identification with the mother, a desire which had been repressed due to the effective absence of the latter. The recovery of this desire allowed the play of identifications to resume its course, and the young girl to discard her regressive behaviour towards her father while maintaining her affection towards him.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.333

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1000.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSanté mentale au Québec→Same topicSocial Policies and Family→French-language works237,207→