MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1631887368

Teaching How Private Enterprise Works Using Professional Sports: A Brief Note on the Case of Individual NHL Players' Salaries

2009· article· en· W1631887368 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard J. Cebula

Bibliographic record

VenueMunich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicSports Analytics and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalaryLeagueProductivityNegotiationRevenue sharingRevenueMarginal productProduct (mathematics)Product marketEconomicsLabour economicsBusinessMarketingPublic relationsMicroeconomicsFinanceMarket economyPolitical scienceEconomic growthProduction (economics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As private enterprises in the U.S. and Canada, franchises in the National Hockey League (NHL) can be presumed to be firms pursuing maximum profits. Part of this pursuit involves the negotiation between NHL players and management of player salaries, which (among other things) must be consistent with the productivity level of each player. This educational note endeavors to empirically identify key, quantifiable factors that reflect individual NHL player productivity and as a result help to determine the regular season salary structure for individual NHL players, whether they be goalies, centers, wingmen, or defense-men. Ideally, such information can be useful for the student of private enterprise insofar as it provides insights relevant to free market decisions and outcomes involving marginal revenue product. Thus, this educational note demonstrates to the student of private enterprise how systematic measures of player productivity help to explain NHL player salaries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMunich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)Same topicSports Analytics and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207