MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1632025792 · doi:10.1109/pesgm.2015.7286398

State estimator for electrical distribution systems based on a particle filter

2015· article· en· W1632025792 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtended Kalman filterEstimatorParticle filterKalman filterInvariant extended Kalman filterGaussianControl theory (sociology)Node (physics)Computer scienceState (computer science)Filter (signal processing)AlgorithmEngineeringMathematicsStatisticsPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a state estimator based on the use of a particle filter (PF). Unlike other types of filters, a PF is suitable for both nonlinear systems and non-Gaussian error distributions. The proliferation of distributed energy resources such as distributed generators and controllable loads has been accompanied by a high degree of uncertainty because the lack of sensors necessitates the use of pseudo-measurements rather than real measurements. For this reason, the proposed state estimator was tested using non-accurate measurements. Bus voltages and angles were chosen as state variables. A comparison of the PF with an extended Kalman filter (EKF) on a 5-node distribution system revealed that the PF provides a very high level of performance, superior to that obtained with the EKF. The proposed estimator was further tested on an IEEE 34-node.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207