MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1632025792 · doi:10.1109/pesgm.2015.7286398

State estimator for electrical distribution systems based on a particle filter

2015· article· en· W1632025792 on OpenAlexaff
Safoan Alhalali, Ramadan El‐Shatshat

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtended Kalman filterEstimatorParticle filterKalman filterInvariant extended Kalman filterGaussianControl theory (sociology)Node (physics)Computer scienceState (computer science)Filter (signal processing)AlgorithmEngineeringMathematicsStatisticsPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a state estimator based on the use of a particle filter (PF). Unlike other types of filters, a PF is suitable for both nonlinear systems and non-Gaussian error distributions. The proliferation of distributed energy resources such as distributed generators and controllable loads has been accompanied by a high degree of uncertainty because the lack of sensors necessitates the use of pseudo-measurements rather than real measurements. For this reason, the proposed state estimator was tested using non-accurate measurements. Bus voltages and angles were chosen as state variables. A comparison of the PF with an extended Kalman filter (EKF) on a 5-node distribution system revealed that the PF provides a very high level of performance, superior to that obtained with the EKF. The proposed estimator was further tested on an IEEE 34-node.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207