MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1632223087 · doi:10.1029/2007wr006359

Storm pulses of dissolved CO<sub>2</sub> in a forested headwater Amazonian stream explored using hydrograph separation

2007· article· en· W1632223087 on OpenAlexaff
Mark S. Johnson, Markus Weiler, Eduardo Guimarães Couto, Susan J. Riha, Johannes Lehmann

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Resources Research · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrographStormTRACERHydrology (agriculture)AmazonianEnvironmental scienceDrainage basinGeologyAmazon rainforestOceanographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dissolved CO2 dynamics in stormflow and event water versus preevent water contributions to storm hydrographs were assessed in a forested headwater catchment of the Brazilian Amazon using high‐frequency data. We applied the transfer function hydrograph separation model (TRANSEP) using specific conductance as a conservative tracer, finding preevent water to average 0.79 ± 0.03 of storm discharge (mean ± 1 SE for n = 14 storms). In situ, direct measurements of dissolved CO2 were able to capture new hydrobiogeochemical processes in real time, including CO2 pulses observed on the falling limb of storm hydrographs, the magnitudes of which were inversely related to preevent water fractions (r = −0.97, p < 0.0001).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Resources ResearchSame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207