MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1632468418 · doi:10.7202/011209ar

Variables associées aux préférences relatives au sexe des enfants chez des femmes enceintes primipares

2005· article· fr· W1632468418 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jacques D. Marleau, Jean‐François Saucier, Jean-François Allaire, Martine Maheu

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers québécois de démographie · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFamily Dynamics and Relationships
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineInstitut national de psychiatrie légale Philippe-Pinel
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les données des deux dernières décennies montrent que les femmes enceintes attendant un premier enfant désirent plus souvent une fille qu’un garçon. L’objectif de cette étude est de déterminer les variables associées aux préférences relatives au sexe des enfants chez des femmes enceintes primipares dont l’âge varie entre 18 et 49 ans. Les analyses portent sur 226 femmes qui ont déclaré une préférence, soit pour une fille (n = 88), soit pour un garçon (n = 49), ou qui n’ont déclaré aucune préférence (n = 89). Des variables socio-démographiques, développementales et psychologiques ont été comparées entre les trois groupes de femmes. Les résultats ne révèlent aucune différence au plan statistique pour les variables étudiées. Certaines explications de ces résultats sont avancées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score0.714

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers québécois de démographieSame topicFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsFrench-language works237,207