MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1632517906 · doi:10.15210/interfaces.v4i1.6453

LE RÉEL ET LA FICTION CHEZ SERGIO KOKIS: UNE ÉTUDE DE LE PAVILLON DES MIROIRS.

2012· article· fr· W1632517906 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dominique Boxus

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sergio Kokis é um escritor quebequense de origem brasileira. É bastante excepcional o fato que ele tenha escolhido escrever na língua do outro: o francês. No romance Le Pavillon des miroirs (1995), um narrador conta sua vida, desde sua infância e sua adolescência no Brasil até sua saída para o Quebec. Procura traduzir todas as imagens do seu passado brasileiro armazenadas dentro de se, busca o sentido do seu itinerário de artista exilado. Trata-se de uma autobiografia? O narrador é o espelho de Kokis? O Brasil representado é real? Olhando para outros textos publicados pelo autor - Les langages de la création (1996) et L’Art du maquillage (1997) -, é possível responder a essas perguntas e entrever o sentido da experiência estética desse escritor-pintor habitado pelo diverso.Résumé: Sergio Kokis est un écrivain québécois d’origine brésilienne. I1 est remarquable qu’il ait choisi d’écrire dans la langue de l’autre: le français. Dans le roman Le Pavillon des miroirs (1995), un narrateur raconte sa vie, depuis son enfance et son adolescence au Brésil jusqu’à son départ pour le Québec. S’efforçant de traduire la foule d’images de son passé brésilien qu’il a emmagasinées en lui, il cherche le sens de son itinéraire d’artiste exilé. S’agit-il d’un récit autobiographique? Le narrateur est-il Kokis lui-même et le Brésil représenté correspond-t-il à la réalité? Au regard d’autres textes publiés par l’auteur — Les langages de la création (1996) et L’Art do maquillage (1997) —, il est possible de répondre à ces questions et d’entrevoir le sens de la démarche de cet écrivain-peintre qu’habite le divers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score0.561

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0230.022
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)→Same topicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis→French-language works237,207→