A variable temperature Fe3+ electron paramagnetic resonance study of Sn1−xFexO2 (0.00⩽x⩽0.05)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
X -band (∼9.5GHz) electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) studies of Fe3+ ions in Sn1−xFexO2 powders with 0.00⩽x⩽0.05 at various temperatures (5–300K) are reported. These samples are interesting to investigate as Fe doping (⩽5%) produces ferromagnetism in SnO2 [A. Punnooose et al., Phys. Rev. B 72, 054402 (2005)], making it a promising ferromagnetic semiconductor at room temperature. The EPR spectrum at 5K can be simulated reasonably well as the overlap of spectra due to seven magnetically inequivalent Fe3+ ions: four low-spin (S=1∕2) and three high-spin (S=5∕2) ions, characterized by different spin-Hamiltonian parameters, overlapped by three broad ferromagnetic resonance spectra. The three high-spin ions, situated substitutionally in the interior of nanodomains, are characterized by smaller zero-field splitting (ZFS) parameters D and E, so that all their energy levels are populated at 5K. On the other hand, the four low-spin ions are situated interstitially at the surfaces of nanodomains. They are characterized by much larger ZFS, so that only their lowest Kramers doublets are occupied at 5K. Based on this simulation, it is concluded that the observed spectra at different temperatures can be reproduced by changing appropriately the relative overlaps of the various paramagnetic and ferromagnetic characters, which remain present over the temperature range studied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it