MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1632572629 · doi:10.22323/1.130.0033

Searches for new physics with jets at ATLAS

2011· article· en· W1632572629 on OpenAlexaff
L. Courneyea

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtlas (anatomy)Computer sciencePhysicsParticle physicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using data taken by the ATLAS detector at √ s = 7 TeV, di-jet and multi-jet events were analyzed for evidence of new physics.The di-jet events were used to set a constraint on quark compositeness, while the multi-jets were used to probe for low-scale gravity and weakly-coupled string theory.For the di-jet analysis, di-jet χ distributions were obtained from a dataset which corresponded to an integrated luminosity of 3.1 pb -1 .Analysis of the χ distributions excludes quark contact interactions at a 95% confidence level up to a compositeness scale of 3.4 TeV.Through multi-body final states, a search was done for evidence of a fundamental scale of gravity, M D , of order 1 TeV.Events with ∑ p T > 700 GeV and invariant mass > 800 GeV were selected from a sample with integrated luminosity of (295 ± 32) nb -1 .This yielded 193 events, all of which were multi-jet events.The number of events was in agreement with the QCD prediction of 254 ± 18(stat.) ± 83(syst.), and an upper limit of 0.34 nb at the 95% confidence level was set for new physics models with these final states.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0080.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies→French-language works237,207→