MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1633042295 · doi:10.7202/013228ar

La sanitarisation du social : les professionnels et l’éducation pour la santé en milieu pénitentiaire

2006· article· fr· W1633042295 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Éric Farges

Bibliographic record

VenueLien social et Politiques · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La réforme du 18 janvier 1994 délégant au secteur hospitalier la gestion des soins en prison, qui relevait auparavant de l’Administration pénitentiaire, marque l’inscription d’une logique de santé publique en milieu carcéral. Outre la délivrance de soins primaires, le législateur fixe au personnel hospitalier une mission de prévention. Orientées vers la libération et la réinsertion du détenu, les actions d’éducation pour la santé visent également à améliorer de façon marginale la vie quotidienne en détention. Pourtant, cette démarche de prévention s’apparente à certains égards à un processus de « sanitarisation » de l’institution pénitentiaire. Interroger ce phénomène à partir du point de vue des professionnels sur leur propre pratique permet de souligner les contradictions qu’ils éprouvent de façon quotidienne, sans délégitimer leur action.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.405 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLien social et PolitiquesSame topicHealth, Medicine and SocietyFrench-language works237,207