La «vie culturelle» et son histoire. Quelques réflexions sur la notion de «vie»1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent article explore quelques-uns des enjeux méthodologiques que soulève la notion de « vie culturelle » sur laquelle repose le projet de recherche Penser l’histoire de la vie culturelle au Québec, dont l’objectif général est de préparer une histoire de la culture artistique au Québec de la fin du xixe au milieu du xxe siècle. La notion de culture qui fonde le projet sert d’abord à poser l’hypothèse de traits communs, récurrents et transversaux aux diverses disciplines artistiques et à briser l’isolement de ces disciplines instituées en étudiant la circulation des concepts et des schèmes cognitifs, ainsi que celle des figures, des formes et des thèmes plus spécifiques à notre objet. La notion de « vie » est là pour contrer celle de « structure » ; elle sert à introduire le mouvement, l’incertitude, l’inachèvement, l’incomplétude. Quatre problèmes sont envisagés plus spécifiquement : le temps comme altérité, la configuration de l’objet, la périodisation et le statut de l’oeuvre artistique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.048 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".